Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Heather Watson vs Julia Goerges Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Watson vs Goerges analysis and find out who is favored!
Heather Watson vs Julia Goerges Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Watson 1 - 1 Goerges
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Watson has won 49.15% of points on their second serve, while Goerges has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Watson, in recent form, has won 56.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Goerges has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.82% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Watson has saved 55.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goerges has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Watson has won 47.92% of matches played (W/L 23/ 25), with Goerges winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Watson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 73/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 58/ 58). Goerges has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 84/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 178/ 154).
- Player level: In the last year, Watson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10), where as Goerges has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Watson winning 1 times and Goerges being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Watson winning 2 and Goerges winning 3. The last match between Watson and Goerges was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 11-03-2015, First, Hard with Heather Watson getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Watson and Goerges have played a deciding set 1 times, with Watson winning 1 times and Goerges 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Watson winning 0, and Goerges 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Watson has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.15 while Goerges has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Watson has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goerges has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Watson has converted 45.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goerges has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
154
Rank
38
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
9
High
35
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
54% (404-338)
Career Total W/L
59% (468-331)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,525,404
Career Prize Money
$5,703,383
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Heather Watson | Julia Goerges |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 24 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:37 | 1:54:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (89/157) | 54% (80/149) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (60/89) | 64% (51/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 34% (23/68) | 45% (31/69) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (10/16) | 65% (11/17) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (67/149) | 47% (74/157) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Heather Watson
Player
Julia Goerges
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Heather Watson
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Heather Watson | Julia Goerges |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (22/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (220/214) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 224.11 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (846/1393) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (559/846) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (273/547) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (65/141) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (575/1381) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Heather Watson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Heather Watson
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Heather Watson
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Heather Watson
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Heather Watson
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Alana Smith
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Heather Watson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
8
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taylah Preston
Player
Heather Watson
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Heather Watson
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
8
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
5
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
32%
(
14 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Heather Watson
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Antonia Ruzic
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Goerges Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Julia Goerges
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
1
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Alison Riske
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danka Kovinic
Player
Julia Goerges
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 4-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Julia Goerges
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Julia Goerges
58%
(
63 of
109)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
99)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Camila Giorgi
40%
(
19 of
47)
1st Serve %
41%
(
30 of
73)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
11
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alison Riske
Player
Julia Goerges
60%
(
56 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
3
Aces
10
10
Double Faults
6
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Petra Martic
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Watson Vs Goerges Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
